| Well, let me start off by spelling things out | | | | like any other work of art. You have your |
| very clearly. There are two kinds of | | | | material. What it looks like when you are |
| rewriting. Actually you rewrite either one in | | | | through with it is what sets it apart. The |
| pretty much the same way but why you're doing | | | | great thing is that many different artists |
| it and the material you're rewriting makes a | | | | can produce many different works of art from |
| big difference. Let's first get what's a | | | | the same lump of content clay, each wonderful |
| no-no out of the way. What's wrong is picking | | | | in its own unique way. And that's what this |
| up someone else's hard work and rewriting it | | | | game is all about. It's all about being |
| so you pass it off as your own. However, when | | | | 'unique'. If you can make it unique, you're |
| you have bought the content (that's what I | | | | in the game in a big way. That's what's meant |
| prefer to call PLR articles), then you have | | | | by rewriting becoming the rage. |
| the right to rewrite. And that's the kind of | | | | |
| rewriting that should and could become the | | | | The trick is to view it differently. To see |
| rage, if it hasn't already done so. | | | | what incredible possibilities it holds. There |
| | | | are many with vision who have seen its |
| There will be many who tell you it isn't | | | | tremendous potential. It's the kind of |
| quite the done thing. That writing should be | | | | activity that should be proudly brought up |
| done the good, old-fashioned way. All that | | | | front and displayed, not pushed behind and |
| research and thought...now how can you call | | | | out of sight somewhere. True original |
| it a good piece of writing sans all those | | | | writing, if you want to make the distinction, |
| ingredients? I beg to disagree. Consider the | | | | is great when you have a great writer doing |
| articles that you buy as content. Anyone, but | | | | it. Rewriting too can be stupendous if you |
| anyone can pay for content and buy it. Then | | | | have a great writer doing it. For one thing, |
| all you do is shape it and make it yours by | | | | it's faster. The material is in front of you. |
| putting your own signature on it. That is or | | | | For another, instead of focusing on both form |
| rather should be the way rewriting is looked | | | | and content, all you have to do is |
| at. It really isn't something to be looked | | | | concentrate on the form. You can tweak it, |
| down upon. No way. It isn't a sort of poorer | | | | fashion it the way you want and play it your |
| cousin or inferior being to writing. In fact, | | | | own special way. If it rises above the |
| it could very easily be elevated to an art. | | | | cacophony and babble of badly written stuff |
| | | | to a thing of beauty, that's your doing, just |
| Do I hear a burst of laughter or sniggers, | | | | yours. |
| maybe? Let me put it to you like this. It's | | | | |